• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Explorer ST Forum and Explorer ST community dedicated to Explorer ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Explorer ST Forum today!


2022 Ford Explorer Platinum ST

OP
PlatinumST
Messages
296
Reactions
217
Points
37
Location
Utah
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer Platinum
Thread Starter #141
Just FYI, in my opinion- don't bother with the downpipes until you decide to change out the turbos. At this point, they won't make any real difference (10hp?) and you'll save a lot of money on the install by doing both at the same time.
That makes a lot of sense. Originally I got them to supplent the exhaust sound, but it sounds great as it is.
Have you ordered the Timberline rear diff yet?
Yes I have. I ordered it when I took delivery. It should be arriving within the next week or two along with the ST front axle and the 4 bolt rear subframe.
 

Last edited:

CareerFiremanGuy

1000 Post Club
Firefighter/EMT
Messages
1,077
Reactions
779
Points
262
Location
USA
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer ST
And here I thought you all got the Esssssssssss Teeeeeeeeee for the performance. :unsure: Note to self, Esssssssssss Teeeeeeeeee owners bought they're Explorers because of the black trim. Performance is secondary. Got it, thanks for the clarification! ;)
And Esssssss Teeeeeeeee owners thought you Platinum buyers bought the car for fancy interiors and chrome "upgrades.":cool: Note to self, Platinum owners got their cars because they thought they were getting the equivalent of Audi's because of some Tri-Diamond perforated leather seats. Got it, thanks for clearing that up.:p

LOL There are still plenty of parts that can be replaced: transmission, turbos/waste gates, injectors, fuel pump, etc., etc. Just look at Kevin's ride...
Parts manufacturers must love people like you!
 

OP
PlatinumST
Messages
296
Reactions
217
Points
37
Location
Utah
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer Platinum
Thread Starter #143
And Esssssss Teeeeeeeee owners thought you Platinum buyers bought the car for fancy interiors and chrome "upgrades.":cool: Note to self, Platinum owners got their cars because they thought they were getting the equivalent of Audi's because of some Tri-Diamond perforated leather seats. Got it, thanks for clearing that up.:p
Oh I absolutely bought the Platinum for the bougie interior! Though I personally don't like the showyness of all the chrome...as for the Tri-Diamond perforated leather, my wife's '18 Explorer has that but I guess I missed out. Now I'm feeling cheated! Lol
Parts manufacturers must love people like you!
:oops: Unfortunately, you're not wrong! I ask myself regularly why I do it, and then I drive it and it all makes sense. In that moment at least...
 

OP
PlatinumST
Messages
296
Reactions
217
Points
37
Location
Utah
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer Platinum
Thread Starter #144
Still waiting on axles...in the mean time, my tint appointment finally came. Added 35% ceramic over the stock all around and a 5% on the top of the windshield. Also added the thin blue line American flag on the rear side windows.
20220627_210854.jpg
 

OP
PlatinumST
Messages
296
Reactions
217
Points
37
Location
Utah
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer Platinum
Thread Starter #145
First world problems, the saga continues. Explorer went back into the paintshop. Can you guess why? :ROFLMAO::mad:
20220705_141804.jpg
20220705_141749.jpg
20220705_141810.jpg
20220705_141756.jpg
20220705_141844.jpg
20220705_141829.jpg
20220618_194856.jpg
Yep! You guessed it! The biggest issue is the peeling paint, but the paint techs also touched the original paint along the roof line, A pillars, B pillars, C pillars and front fenders/hood with some sort of chemicals on their hands in turn wrecking the clear coat. If you look closely at the blue painted "Explorer" you'll also notice that they had zero attention to detail. This is true for all 3 locations. Looks good from far, but is far from good.

I understand growing pains, but this lack of workmanship and detail is just embarrassing. I know the owner's work has been impeccable but his guys'...we'll not so much. There were flaws from the get go, but the peeling was progressively getting worse. (I could have taken it back sooner, but I wanted to drive it for a bit before taking it back. So far the paint shop has had it roughly as long as I have.) The owner was very embarrassed, to say the least, and agreed that he would personally redo the job and fix all the handprints, etc. Of course at no cost. 3 weeks and I'll get her back. I'm hopeful that the axles and rear crossmember/subframe will be in by then so I can get them installed along with the Steeda lowering springs, shocks, and struts, and the roof rack delete and finally the Velgen VF5s in 22x10.5 and 315/35/22 Pirelli PZ4s. After that there will just be a few little details and that will conclude the parts install of stage 1...unless Adam at ZFG feels the SPD DPs will add anything for the 91/E50 tune. Then comes the research and planning for stage 2, sometime next year.

So far for stage 2 I'm thinking a built 10R80 instead of the Level 10 10R60, HPFP, injectors, turbos, maybe a bit of internal engine work (if I can find a reputable shop) and the likes. Also open to any ideas/suggestions.
 

Attachments

UNBROKEN

4000 Post Club
Messages
4,167
Reactions
4,829
Points
352
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Sorry you have to deal with it but from your first pics…this was always going to happen. They didn’t prep…at all.
 

TMac

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,691
Reactions
1,449
Points
262
Location
Knoxville, TN
I'm following your build closely. Sorry about the paint problems, but I'd agree with @UNBROKEN it didn't look kosher from the first. Hopefully they'll get it right. But....since you ask for "ideas/suggestions", in terms of the engine mods, I think I'd look at that last. The trick is to achieve the HP you want while keeping the torque numbers reasonable. And especially to avoid high torque numbers at low RPMs. I've always been curious about upping the rpms on the stock engine. The cams have enough lift (don't have duration numbers) and there's no other mechanical reason this engine won't run to over 7k rpm unless the valve springs aren't up to the job.

The recent information (which may not be reliable) shows dyno charts from Kruppa's ride over 7k rpm on the stock engine. That opens up a lot of room before I'd look at the 10R80 option. For example, if you could sustain the cylinder pressure to produce 500 lb/ft of torque, at 6K we're talking 571 crank HP on gas (around 510 WHP). At 7k, that would net over 667 crank HP (around 605 WHP). Those numbers are less than other dynos I've seen showing that much torque through the 10R60 even though it's only rated around 442 lb/ft. Remember average cylinder pressure is torque- the higher RPM we can sustain that torque the more HP.

The only way to achieve it of course is with higher flowing compressors and turbines. I'm more of a street/sleeper type of person. I'm not drag racing from every stoplight and could care less about trying to mix up blends of ethanol, so for me, I'm looking at 93 (10-15% ethanol) for a daily driver.
 

Last edited:
OP
PlatinumST
Messages
296
Reactions
217
Points
37
Location
Utah
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer Platinum
Thread Starter #148
Sorry you have to deal with it but from your first pics…this was always going to happen. They didn’t prep…at all.
Thank you I can't say that I'm terribly surprised, but I really wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt. Still disappointing. I talked to him about the lack of prep and specifically asked that he remove the texture and do a better job sanding on the chrome pieces. I didn't take any pictures, but the paint on the grill was also already failing. Not as badly as the plastic, but still way worse than it should have been after just a couple of weeks. As you mentioned, all goes back to the lack of proper prep, or no prep at all. Fingers crossed that round two goes better.

If all else fails, I'll take it to one of the premium body shops. I'm hopeful it doesn't come to that, but the fact he allowed this type of work to leave his shop shakes my confidence a bit...
 

OP
PlatinumST
Messages
296
Reactions
217
Points
37
Location
Utah
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer Platinum
Thread Starter #149
I'm following your build closely. Sorry about the paint problems, but I'd agree with @UNBROKEN it didn't look kosher from the first. Hopefully they'll get it right. But....since you ask for "ideas/suggestions", in terms of the engine mods, I think I'd look at that last. The trick is to achieve the HP you want while keeping the torque numbers reasonable. And especially to avoid high torque numbers at low RPMs. I've always been curious about upping the rpms on the stock engine. The cams have enough lift (don't have duration numbers) and there's no other mechanical reason this engine won't run to over 7k rpm unless the valve springs aren't up to the job.

The recent information (which may not be reliable) shows dyno charts from Kruppa's ride over 7k rpm on the stock engine. That opens up a lot of room before I'd look at the 10R80 option. For example, if you could sustain the cylinder pressure to produce 500 lb/ft of torque, at 6K we're talking 571 crank HP on gas (around 510 WHP). At 7k, that would net over 667 crank HP (around 605 WHP). Those numbers are less than other dynos I've seen showing that much torque through the 10R60 even though it's only rated around 442 lb/ft. Remember average cylinder pressure is torque- the higher RPM we can sustain that torque the more HP.

The only way to achieve it of course is with higher flowing compressors and turbines. I'm more of a street/sleeper type of person. I'm not drag racing from every stoplight and could care less about trying to mix up blends of ethanol, so for me, I'm looking at 93 (10-15% ethanol) for a daily driver. If you're looking to for that type of performance, you could easily see 550 WHP (~620 crank) on gas with just the Pure 700 turbos and the Fen Fab down-pipes. In which case you wouldn't need the fuel pump, injectors, or all the transmission upgrades.
Thanks for the suggestions. Forgive my ignorance, if I'm reading correctly, you're suggesting higher flowing turbos and modding the engine to allow for higher sustained RPMs?

I also like the idea of a sleeper, though I'm still stuck on getting into the high 600/low 700 WHP numbers. Irrational to be sure. I can't help but think that if I can get into 550WHP on 91/93 octane for daily driving, I'm guessing it wouldn't be too difficult to get into the high 600/ low 700 WHP on either an ethanol blend or full ethanol?

If the 10R60 is rated at up to 442lb/ft of torque, wouldn't the 500 lb/ft of torque lead to early transmission failure or what am I missing? It seems the popular route is going with a Level 10 bullet proofing. My thoughts were that a built 10R80 would be a bit more money, but would be much stronger? I haven't read/heard of anyone actually having done this conversion and haven't started reading up on it yet, so don't know if it's even possible.
 

TMac

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,691
Reactions
1,449
Points
262
Location
Knoxville, TN
I'm suggesting that based on what I've seen from certain dyno runs you wouldn't have to modify the engine to achieve higher RPMS. And yes, higher flowing turbos are a necessity for the power you want to run.

You're always free to run ethanol or mixtures- bear in mind that you need a lot more ethanol than gasoline so getting to the big HP numbers will require injectors and fuel pump.

Although the R60 is rated at 442 torque, you can bet there's leeway there. Especially since we've seen stock 10R60 over 500 lb/ft on several different dyno runs. Remember also, 500 lb/ft at at 2500 rpm is more stressful on parts than 500 lb/ft at 4500 rpm.

So I'm advocating a frugal approach that will allow you to add parts in the correct sequence while limiting your dollar outlay. An intercooler and a tune are known quantities. Looking at your aspirations, I'd do turbos and downpipes and stretch the rev limit up. I believe that will get you to the 550 WHP you're looking for albeit at a higher RPM. It'll also keep the torque to a reasonable number. If that's not enough then you'll have to do the injectors and pump and start running ethanol or heavy blends.
 

OP
PlatinumST
Messages
296
Reactions
217
Points
37
Location
Utah
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer Platinum
Thread Starter #151
I'm suggesting that based on what I've seen from certain dyno runs you wouldn't have to modify the engine to achieve higher RPMS. And yes, higher flowing turbos are a necessity for the power you want to run.

You're always free to run ethanol or mixtures- bear in mind that you need a lot more ethanol than gasoline so getting to the big HP numbers will require injectors and fuel pump.

Although the R60 is rated at 442 torque, you can bet there's leeway there. Especially since we've seen stock 10R60 over 500 lb/ft on several different dyno runs. Remember also, 500 lb/ft at at 2500 rpm is more stressful on parts than 500 lb/ft at 4500 rpm.

So I'm advocating a frugal approach that will allow you to add parts in the correct sequence while limiting your dollar outlay. An intercooler and a tune are known quantities. Looking at your aspirations, I'd do turbos and downpipes and stretch the rev limit up. I believe that will get you to the 550 WHP you're looking for albeit at a higher RPM. It'll also keep the torque to a reasonable number. If that's not enough then you'll have to do the injectors and pump and start running ethanol or heavy blends.
Thanks for the feedback!
 

Toyman

New Member
U.S. Air Force Veteran
Messages
19
Reactions
6
Points
2
Location
Winter Garden, FL, USA
Can you give us a ballpark figure as to the cost of your project?
 

OP
PlatinumST
Messages
296
Reactions
217
Points
37
Location
Utah
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer Platinum
Thread Starter #153
Can you give us a ballpark figure as to the cost of your project?
Did my wife put you up to asking this question?! :eek: lol I feel like this is almost like asking a lady her age...or worse...her weight! Maybe I'm wrong...or just overly sensitive...lol

I've probably put more into it than I should have. Some of it could have been avoided had I started with an ST in the first place. As I understand it, the Steeda shocks and struts are OE ST. Axles have taller gears on the Platinum so those are being swapped, though I'm getting the Torsen LSD in the process, so that should be cool. Roof rack delete is a factory option, so that could have been avoided. STs come with black accents, Platinum comes with brushed chrome. Blacking it out would have been avoided. I'm sure there is more that wouldn't have been needed...moral of the story, save yourself a boatload of money and start with an ST :ROFLMAO:
 

Messages
300
Reactions
138
Points
37
Location
Socal
Did my wife put you up to asking this question?! :eek: lol I feel like this is almost like asking a lady her age...or worse...her weight! Maybe I'm wrong...or just overly sensitive...lol

I've probably put more into it than I should have. Some of it could have been avoided had I started with an ST in the first place. As I understand it, the Steeda shocks and struts are OE ST. Axles have taller gears on the Platinum so those are being swapped, though I'm getting the Torsen LSD in the process, so that should be cool. Roof rack delete is a factory option, so that could have been avoided. STs come with black accents, Platinum comes with brushed chrome. Blacking it out would have been avoided. I'm sure there is more that wouldn't have been needed...moral of the story, save yourself a boatload of money and start with an ST :ROFLMAO:
LOL but then you miss out on the adaptive headlights, the leather stitched dashboard and the ugly? two scheme interior color. I hate teh brush chrome on the Platinums, could've gone with something nicer/luxurious like the mesh grill Cadillac's put on higher trims.
 

Messages
73
Reactions
31
Points
17
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
LOL but then you miss out on the adaptive headlights, the leather stitched dashboard and the ugly? two scheme interior color. I hate teh brush chrome on the Platinums, could've gone with something nicer/luxurious like the mesh grill Cadillac's put on higher trims.
The St's Don't have the adaptive headlights? That's odd smh.
 

Messages
300
Reactions
138
Points
37
Location
Socal
The St's Don't have the adaptive headlights? That's odd smh.
Nor projector housing's either. I believe these are only Platinum exclusive.
 

OP
PlatinumST
Messages
296
Reactions
217
Points
37
Location
Utah
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer Platinum
Thread Starter #157
Just got the email from the dealer which I've been waiting for since the middle of May. All of my parts are in! Front ST axel, rear axle with Torsen LSD, rear 4 bolt subframe, and roof rack delete!
I'm hoping to get the Explorer back from paint next week and then it'll go in to the dealer to get all these parts installed. They'll also install the Steeda springs, shocks, and struts.
I took delivery on May 11. With the silly paint snafu, I've only really been able to drive her for 3 weeks. Sometimes I forget I even have her. It'll be nice to get her back and have the majority of stage 1 complete. Really looking forward to the ZFG tuning!
 

Cruising68

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,337
Reactions
997
Points
262
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Just got the email from the dealer which I've been waiting for since the middle of May. All of my parts are in! Front ST axel, rear axle with Torsen LSD, rear 4 bolt subframe, and roof rack delete!
I'm hoping to get the Explorer back from paint next week and then it'll go in to the dealer to get all these parts installed. They'll also install the Steeda springs, shocks, and struts.
I took delivery on May 11. With the silly paint snafu, I've only really been able to drive her for 3 weeks. Sometimes I forget I even have her. It'll be nice to get her back and have the majority of stage 1 complete. Really looking forward to the ZFG tuning!
Nice! Exciting times for sure!
 

Messages
300
Reactions
138
Points
37
Location
Socal
Just got the email from the dealer which I've been waiting for since the middle of May. All of my parts are in! Front ST axel, rear axle with Torsen LSD, rear 4 bolt subframe, and roof rack delete!
I'm hoping to get the Explorer back from paint next week and then it'll go in to the dealer to get all these parts installed. They'll also install the Steeda springs, shocks, and struts.
I took delivery on May 11. With the silly paint snafu, I've only really been able to drive her for 3 weeks. Sometimes I forget I even have her. It'll be nice to get her back and have the majority of stage 1 complete. Really looking forward to the ZFG tuning!
You're going to have the fastest best handling 20+ Explorer Platinum, thats for sure.
 

Messages
291
Reactions
144
Points
37
Location
Roseville
Vehicle
2021 Explorer ST
If all else fails, I'll take it to one of the premium body shops. I'm hopeful it doesn't come to that, but the fact he allowed this type of work to leave his shop shakes my confidence a bit...
Always go to the premium shops when it comes to paint. But your almost done now so I guess it dont matter. I hope the owner takes his time and does it correctly.

Just remember building it is half the fun enjoy it.
I have a car that is in its 4th year of build.
 



Top