• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Explorer ST Forum and Explorer ST community dedicated to Explorer ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Explorer ST Forum today!


Need Intake Opinions

Messages
7
Reactions
2
Points
2
Location
united states
Vehicle
2023 Explorer ST
#1
I'm getting the itch to waste some more $$ on my ST, and while mine sounds great (CVfab DPs, Thermal 2.5 exhaust) I find myself yearning for those sweet sweet turbos sounds. I've been looking at the HSF and fenfab intakes for a while, but can't find any solid videos with decent audio from inside the cabin. Are you getting the loud whoosh in the cabin that I'm jonesing for? Videos and sound clips would be great. Anyone regret their intake?
Quick disclaimer: I fully understand the lack of performance benefit here, just looking to create a nostalgic soundtrack while I'm hauling the family.
 

Messages
5,574
Reactions
6,739
Points
352
Location
Houston, TX, USA
#3

Combatvet

Member
U.S. Army Veteran
Messages
251
Reactions
118
Points
37
Location
Texas
Vehicle
2025 Explorer ST
#4
Just be prepared for P2C90, P04F0 error codes with the FENFAB, while not everyone experiences them, they do occur. FORSCAN can clear them but the HP Tuners RTD4 cannot clear them.
 

Messages
2,956
Reactions
1,321
Points
252
Location
Nevada
Vehicle
'20 Raptor, '22 Explorer ST, '14 GT500, '03 F150
#5
What’s not awesome is all the hot air it draws into the one air filter. That’s the worst intake design out there of these cars. There’s a reason nobody else did that.
I ran a whole bunch of datalogs and so has Chris, we saw literally no difference in IAT2 numbers. Just because you may believe it sucks in hot air, the reality is is it doesn’t make a difference at all.
 

Messages
2,956
Reactions
1,321
Points
252
Location
Nevada
Vehicle
'20 Raptor, '22 Explorer ST, '14 GT500, '03 F150
#6
Just be prepared for P2C90, P04F0 error codes with the FENFAB, while not everyone experiences them, they do occur. FORSCAN can clear them but the HP Tuners RTD4 cannot clear them.
Yep, although someone found a fix for the P2C90 and are testing it more to see if they can implement it as an update.
 

OP
C
Messages
7
Reactions
2
Points
2
Location
united states
Vehicle
2023 Explorer ST
Thread Starter #7
That Big Sucker sounds cool but I've been weary of it considering the price is higher than competitors and the added clutter of the driver's side filter (especially at that weird angle) would probably drive me nuts.

I had also heard about the Fenfab error codes, I think I saw it was linked to one of the T junctions they were using?
All things considered it seems like the HSF is the way to go for a clean install, with no additional opportunity for heat soak, however I still don't know that it will result in the rad sounds I'm looking for. If it's underwhelming I'd rather just stay stock.
 

Messages
5,574
Reactions
6,739
Points
352
Location
Houston, TX, USA
#8
I ran a whole bunch of datalogs and so has Chris, we saw literally no difference in IAT2 numbers. Just because you may believe it sucks in hot air, the reality is is it doesn’t make a difference at all.
If someone wants a sub par intake from an absolute prick of a fabricator…his stuff is available. Funny how he runs his mouth online but when he’s standing in front of me he doesn’t have the balls to even open his mouth. He also did a bunch of dick move stuff when he left HSF. There’s a reason he’s not allowed in my FB group…he’s a POS. This thread asked for opinions…there’s mine.
 

Messages
1,898
Reactions
1,612
Points
262
Location
Utah
Vehicle
Exploder
#11
Yeah, I think most members know about you.
 

Messages
2,956
Reactions
1,321
Points
252
Location
Nevada
Vehicle
'20 Raptor, '22 Explorer ST, '14 GT500, '03 F150
#12
That Big Sucker sounds cool but I've been weary of it considering the price is higher than competitors and the added clutter of the driver's side filter (especially at that weird angle) would probably drive me nuts.

I had also heard about the Fenfab error codes, I think I saw it was linked to one of the T junctions they were using?
All things considered it seems like the HSF is the way to go for a clean install, with no additional opportunity for heat soak, however I still don't know that it will result in the rad sounds I'm looking for. If it's underwhelming I'd rather just stay stock.
It’ll be the same noise as the Fenfab or CT, keep in mind you do need to remove the front bumper to install it.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CGMPH7nTc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
 

Messages
2,041
Reactions
1,427
Points
352
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
#13
I think everyone knows I don’t sugar coat things.
That’s what we love about you. You don’t have to try and figure out what you’re saying. Straight and to the point albeit blunt at times. I have offended some by speaking my mind but my true friends appreciate it!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

Messages
27
Reactions
7
Points
2
Location
NJ
Vehicle
2020 Ford Explorer ST
#14
I have the complete HSF/GSP CF setup and you 100% get all the same "noises" as all the open air filter kits on the market and it looks the best IMO. Performance wise I went from trapping like 118-119 to 120-121 consistently by switching out my AFE setup to this setup. I'm not gonna bash any intake but I have seen a legit log of the intakes on the market and this one outperformed all the rest.
 



Top