-
Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features
Welcome to the #1 Explorer ST Forum and Explorer ST community dedicated to Explorer ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Explorer ST Forum today!
Rear end damage
- Thread starter Chrispw24
- Start date
yup, it’s a joke. So what is the correct fix then ford?? You’re proposing two different fixes for the legit same exact issue. I mean it’s kinda insulting that they think customers won’t find this out lol the issue is the same, regular explorer vs police explorer. Yet you’re implementing two different solutions. Ford needs to pay.
I think only applies if it breaks.
2020 Ford Explorer suspension TSB (Bulletin SSM 50471)
Bulletin Date: Feb. 7, 2022 Component: Suspension. Bulletin Summary: Some 2020-2022 explorer vehicles may exhibit a rear axle mounting bolt that has broken. In order to correct the condition, the rear subframe, differential cover, and mounting bolts will need to be replaced in addition to any other damaged
2020 Ford Explorer suspension TSB (Bulletin SSM 50471)
Bulletin Date: Feb. 7, 2022 Component: Suspension. Bulletin Summary: Some 2020-2022 explorer vehicles may exhibit a rear axle mounting bolt that has broken. In order to correct the condition, the rear subframe, differential cover, and mounting bolts will need to be replaced in addition to any other damaged
-
1
- Show All
It'ss a full blown safety recall.. not just a TSB. Dealerships wont be able to deliver vehicles to customers until it is fixed and we that have the recall can go and get the remedy as soon as it's availalbe.
I'm off today but will dive into the recall further tomorrow when I'm at work.
The letter sent to dealers states that just a PCM flash is the fix... i hope thats not the case.. lol
Last edited:
-
2
- Show All
Of course, the jury is still out on the "fix", but I am betting that if it is a PCM fix, it'll be something that may not limit hp/torque, as that would just open up another can of worms. If you think of it from a manufacturer's perspective, the best way to handle this midterm would be something that would limit a tuner's ability to change the tune. Of course, if it's mechanical, some type of differential isolator might be an alternative (I can't see Ford replacing vast amounts of subframes, but it's possible). It's also possible that it's something as simple as some bolts that weren't heat treated correctly. We can all speculate as much as we like, but that would be the most likely "fixes" IMHO.
-
1
- Show All
If it's a PCM change only, my guess is they are tweaking the torque management. Most vehicles have some type to limit abuse. IMO it will definitely involve pulling power under certain conditions. With GM if you pounded the throttle and downshifted, there was always a noticeable lag before power came on. All was done to limit the internal bashing of parts in the transmission. At least in GM's this could be tuned out if you wanted to take the chance and/or beefed up your trans.
The more this appears to not be a mechanical fix, the better I feel about my subframe on order.
The more this appears to not be a mechanical fix, the better I feel about my subframe on order.
02/22 build. Has only 1 bolt. Was kinda bummed when I looked underneath. Just bought it back in March. Been excellent the whole time (one family trip to myrtle beach already under its belt. But I am curious what this fix entails. Would really like 2 bolts. Recall notice just popped up today on FordPass app.
