Search results

Me neither but it would be cheap insurance.

That is why most install instructions recommend putting a towel down on the windshield when doing this.

Good luck getting over that darned covid. It can really suck.

And the 3/36 starts from when the vehicle was first sold.

No argument from me. Just stating why I use 87 Octane. What are your thoughts on using E15/Unleaded 88 octane ?

We don't have that. Closest is E15/Unleaded 88 octane. Not sure how I feel about it and I haven't seen any reports from anyone using it.

I agree. Where I'm at it's 90 cents a gallon more for premium 91 octane versus 87 octane. 93 octane is near impossible to find here.

There are a number of posts here. https://www.explorerst.org/threads/ford-performance-tune.1984/page-27#post-61924 Most (if not all) that have it seem happy with it.

The Fp tune warranty only applies for 3 years/36,000 miles from the in service date. Your ST may be beyond that. ESP is no help here.

There is 2 good choices. The AWR brace or the ID Brace (More Expensive) https://www.lethalperformance.com/id-speed-rear-differential-brace-2020-explorer-st-idstrdb.html

One thing ZFG may have a leg up is the transmission tuning. I'm not shilling for either on. Warranty the FP tune has the leg up.

Every thing I've seen points to ZFG being the best tune for this platform. All posts on the FP tune people seem happy with it and no negatives. I don't have a tune but just posting about what I've read here and on a couple other forums. I think you would enjoy either one.

I think he should block every one on this forum. He isn't able to carry on a conversation with any one so that way he could pout all alone.

You must have been looking in a mirror when you typed this. It describes you to a T.

That measurement is from the ground to the wheel well. @UNBROKEN is looking from the center of the axle to the wheel well.