Search results

Does the window sticker also show the 52T option? That's the option for the class IV tow package.

According to every experience I've read on this site relating to disabling ASS through ForScan, it cannot be done permanently. It can be disabled via a tuner through the ECU, or an add-on "eliminator" circuit. It seems that the coding for it is in the ECU, not the other body control modules...

That would be my first educated guess. I'm not convinced of a driveline failure, since according to your posts, it retains driveability and function after it happens. And, with it only happening when the temp is low equating to more torque, it seems a reasonable possibility.

I'm not sure the OP isn't possibly correct in thinking it's a torque-related issue. He should probably ask @ZFGracing about it. Certain cars I've seen tuned- particularly VAG platforms- do employ torque sensing mechanisms in the driveline with the ECU taking preventive measures to forestall...

Have y'all considered tire noise? Outside of better insulation in the panels, not much to be done.

Cool! Show us the dyno sheets.

Like the Lexus grilles- looks like they are doing locomotive cow-catchers.

He's wheel spinning at 30-40mph?

Agree on datalog. Are you saying this is the "canned" 93 tune, but you have all the other upgrades? Are you seeing any CELs? Have you checked for any codes being thrown?

Me too.

Check this out: https://www.explorerst.org/threads/pure700-turbo-install.1616/post-20322 At that time, Kevin did NOT have any fuel mods done. IMHO those Pure 700 turbos will not max out the fuel system on 93 unless you have some other significant modifications. Here is the dyno to match...

Why would you buy the fuel system if you're going to use 93? I'm asking because you will not need it even with the larger turbos if you're not using higher percentage ethanol mixes.

Just to be clear, I cannot validate what the poster wrote in that post, but the SAE standard is valid. That being said, if you're going to run e85 for extended periods of time, there "could" be unanticipated problems. But I'm pretty sure e50 is fine.

There are a couple of different ethanol threads on here: Look at this thread, but look at this post: https://www.explorerst.org/threads/e85-question.1352/post-15692

https://www.explorerst.org/threads/jk-performance-products.2906/post-37076

I bought a Typhoon new in '93. It was actually a pretty nice vehicle for what it was. But it can't in anyway be compared to the ST in terms of refinement, etc. Although it did have a stiff suspension and sway bars, over even slightly uneven ground the solid axles made the vehicle ride like a...

An opinion: https://www.explorerst.org/threads/considering-my-1st-tune.4339/post-56714

Increasing the rev limit is really only useful if you're going with big turbos. And by big, I mean larger than the Pure 700s illustrated above which (barring something I'm unaware of) appear to fall off precipitously after 6300 rpm. The ethanol blends will always make more HP due to the higher...

ZFG can definitely tune for it. Here's an old dyno run from Kruppa on 104 octane with the Pure 700 turbos. As to whether that's better than say e70- to get the same amount of HP you'd probably have to upgrade the injectors and pump.

There is an even cheaper alternative: https://www.explorerst.org/threads/2022-ford-explorer-platinum-st.3719/post-53251 Follow the posts I made to @PlatinumST