• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Explorer ST Forum and Explorer ST community dedicated to Explorer ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Explorer ST Forum today!


Which setup is quicker??

F=MA

Active Member
Messages
907
Reactions
581
Points
232
Location
Wichita, KS, USA
#1
ZFG 93 tune, custom 3 inch downpipes (w/cats), 3 inch exhaust, stock intake, Whipple Intercooler

VERSUS

ZFG E50 tune, OEM downpipes, 2.5 inch full exhaust, stock intake, Whipple Intercooler

Say same driver, average of three runs in each vehicle.
 

UNBROKEN

4000 Post Club
Messages
4,244
Reactions
4,955
Points
352
Location
Houston, TX, USA
#3
The e50 tune will be quicker.
 

Messages
153
Reactions
127
Points
37
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
#4
e50.

assuming the tunes are proper, and shift points are perfect.
ethanol burns more aggressively. youre just sacrificing efficiency
 

OP
F=MA

F=MA

Active Member
Messages
907
Reactions
581
Points
232
Location
Wichita, KS, USA
Thread Starter #5
How about.....

ZFG E50 tune, OEM downpipes, 2.5 inch full exhaust, stock intake, Whipple Intercooler

VERSUS

ZFG E85 tune, high volume fuel pump, OEM downpipes, 2.5 inch full exhaust, stock intake, Whipple Intercooler

Say same driver, average of three runs in each vehicle. I assume E85 would win??
 

Messages
153
Reactions
127
Points
37
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
#6
probably e85

HP fuel pump is going to add way more fuel thats needed for power.
then again, its dependent on how much the injector can keep up. youll probably over work the injector.
 



Top