• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Explorer ST Forum and Explorer ST community dedicated to Explorer ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Explorer ST Forum today!


Slower after mods

Messages
6
Reactions
5
Points
2
Location
Papillion, NE
Vehicle
2023 Ford Explorer ST
#21
Did you ever find anything wrong? I recently installed the cv fab intercooler and my dragy times are down about .2 across the board. 0-60 and 1/8 mile. I know there are variables like DA etc. But I am tuned in E50 thru ZFG and was cutting 3.61 - 3.66 consistent 0-60s now I’m lucky to get a 3.79! I even did a data log and sent it to Adam and he said everything checks out and boost is fine. Maybe that extra 30 lbs up front from the intercooler is the culprit
 

Messages
3,143
Reactions
1,390
Points
252
Location
Nevada
Vehicle
'20 Raptor, '22 Explorer ST, '14 GT500, '03 F150
#22
Did you ever find anything wrong? I recently installed the cv fab intercooler and my dragy times are down about .2 across the board. 0-60 and 1/8 mile. I know there are variables like DA etc. But I am tuned in E50 thru ZFG and was cutting 3.61 - 3.66 consistent 0-60s now I’m lucky to get a 3.79! I even did a data log and sent it to Adam and he said everything checks out and boost is fine. Maybe that extra 30 lbs up front from the intercooler is the culprit
I mean that’s a literal tenth of a second. Could be a lot of different variables.
 

Messages
722
Reactions
394
Points
82
Location
Maryland
Vehicle
2020 Explorer ST
#23
Did you ever find anything wrong? I recently installed the cv fab intercooler and my dragy times are down about .2 across the board. 0-60 and 1/8 mile. I know there are variables like DA etc. But I am tuned in E50 thru ZFG and was cutting 3.61 - 3.66 consistent 0-60s now I’m lucky to get a 3.79! I even did a data log and sent it to Adam and he said everything checks out and boost is fine. Maybe that extra 30 lbs up front from the intercooler is the culprit
Doubt the IC weight is culprit. I've had 10 times that weight in the cargo area and ran 3.9s 0-60 with just a 93 DMS tune. (no E85)
Are you running the same track at the same ambient temp?
 



Top