• Sign Up! To view all forums and unlock additional cool features

    Welcome to the #1 Explorer ST Forum and Explorer ST community dedicated to Explorer ST owners and enthusiasts. Register for an account, it's free and it's easy, so don't hesitate to join the Explorer ST Forum today!


Car & Driver tests $108k 450 hp/6,100 lb Lincoln Navigator. Results as expected ...

CareerFiremanGuy

1000 Post Club
Firefighter/EMT
Messages
1,083
Reactions
812
Points
262
Location
USA
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer ST
#1
Where on earth did they add an extra 1,225 lbs in weight?
It's lateral acceleration/braking/mpg numbers are more reminiscent of a vehicle from the 70's.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a39317584/2022-lincoln-navigator-drive/

By The Numbers: Navigator / ST

0-60 mph: Nav 5.3 sec / ST 5.2 sec
1/4-Mile: Nav 13.9 sec @ 100 mph / ST 13.8 sec @ 101 mph
Rolling Start 5–60 mph: Nav 6.0 sec / ST 5.9 sec
30–50 mph: Nav 3.2 sec / ST 3.2 sec
50–70 mph: Nav 4.0 sec / ST 3.8 sec
Top Speed (gov ltd): Nav 124 mph / ST 146 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: Nav 185 ft / ST 161 ft
Skidpad: Nav 0.75 g / ST 0.86 g
Observed MPG: Nav 16 mpg / ST 21 mpg
 

Cruising68

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,596
Reactions
1,165
Points
262
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
#2
Damn over $100k for a Navigator. My first
New car was a 1987 Chevy Cavalier Z24 was $10,500 loaded


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

OP
CareerFiremanGuy

CareerFiremanGuy

1000 Post Club
Firefighter/EMT
Messages
1,083
Reactions
812
Points
262
Location
USA
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer ST
Thread Starter #3
I remember buying a brand new 2004 SRT-4, it was $20k, fast as heck and worth every penny!
 

Messages
496
Reactions
278
Points
67
Location
Davidson County, NC
Vehicle
2021 ST
#4
How many bolts hold the rear end? :LOL:
 

Chaseg08

Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
Messages
89
Reactions
57
Points
17
Location
Golden, CO, USA
#5
Navigator is an Expedition. Aviator is an Explorer. The Navigator is a much larger vehicle.
 

Cruising68

1000 Post Club
Messages
1,596
Reactions
1,165
Points
262
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
#6
Yes but I think it was more about the price difference 60k vs over 100k but I might be wrong. I’ve had plenty of full sized SUV and while they all went ok, handling was NOTHING like my ST.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

OP
CareerFiremanGuy

CareerFiremanGuy

1000 Post Club
Firefighter/EMT
Messages
1,083
Reactions
812
Points
262
Location
USA
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer ST
Thread Starter #7
How many bolts hold the rear end? :LOL:
Quick Answer: One short of what's necessary!

Navigator is an Expedition. Aviator is an Explorer. The Navigator is a much larger vehicle.
Barely larger in cargo volume and width, more passenger volume. Worth an extra $30k-$48k?

DIMENSIONS: NAV vs. ST

Wheelbase: Nav 122.5 in / ST 119.1 in
Length: Nav 210.0 in / ST 199.3 in
Width: Nav 79.9 in / 78.9 in
Height: Nav 76.3 in / 70.2 in
Passenger Volume: Nav 178 ft / ST 149 ft
Cargo Volume: Nav 19 ft / 18 ft

Yes but I think it was more about the price difference 60k vs over 100k but I might be wrong. I’ve had plenty of full sized SUV and while they all went ok, handling was NOTHING like my ST.
Yup. Nav is more like having an upmarket school bus. ST is performance oriented and better mpg too.
 

Chaseg08

Member
U.S. Navy Veteran
Messages
89
Reactions
57
Points
17
Location
Golden, CO, USA
#8
Barely larger in cargo volume and width, more passenger volume. Worth an extra $30k-$48k?

DIMENSIONS: NAV vs. ST

Wheelbase: Nav 122.5 in / ST 119.1 in
Length: Nav 210.0 in / ST 199.3 in
Width: Nav 79.9 in / 78.9 in
Height: Nav 76.3 in / 70.2 in
Passenger Volume: Nav 178 ft / ST 149 ft
Cargo Volume: Nav 19 ft / 18 ft
Your first question was "Where on earth did they add an extra 1,225 lbs in weight?" It's a completely different vehicle with a larger chassis, trans, motor, etc. It appears that you're comparing the Navigator directly to the Explorer when they are completely different classes of SUV.
 

Messages
390
Reactions
359
Points
67
Location
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Vehicle
2020 Explorer ST
#9
Barely larger in cargo volume and width, more passenger volume. Worth an extra $30k-$48k?
ST is performance oriented and better mpg too.
Well the cost difference isn't about the size, it's about the interior and build quality. And not that people buying a Navigator (or an ExST) are that concerned with MPG, but a smaller, lighter vehicle with a smaller motor getting better MPG isn't that much of a surprise.
 

OP
CareerFiremanGuy

CareerFiremanGuy

1000 Post Club
Firefighter/EMT
Messages
1,083
Reactions
812
Points
262
Location
USA
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer ST
Thread Starter #10
Your first question was "Where on earth did they add an extra 1,225 lbs in weight?" It's a completely different vehicle with a larger chassis, trans, motor, etc. It appears that you're comparing the Navigator directly to the Explorer when they are completely different classes of SUV.
You are right, I am comparing two different classes of SUV's. That was my intention, to ask if an extra $50k is worth the additional accoutrements .

Well the cost difference isn't about the size, it's about the interior and build quality. And not that people buying a Navigator (or an ExST) are that concerned with MPG, but a smaller, lighter vehicle with a smaller motor getting better MPG isn't that much of a surprise.
Actually, it's about both size and quality. And my noting of mpg was not for the sake of Nav owners, it was for the sake of comparison. That people would desire such a configuration isn't that much of a surprise considering the world we're living in.
 

Messages
390
Reactions
359
Points
67
Location
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Vehicle
2020 Explorer ST
#11
In the spirit of this thread, comparing two vastly different cars, I'll compare my ExST to the Ford Transit I just rented from UHaul:

Performance: I didn't measure anything with a Draggy, but the Transit is rocking the 3.5EB, so it was able to keep up with slow Friday lunch-time traffic just as well as my ST would have.

Space: Not even a contest, the Transit wins.

Fuel Economy: Transit wins! 17 mpg over the 20 miles I drove it, vs my ST usually getting 16 around town.

Sporty-ness: Well the Transit has only 2 seats so it's obviously a sports car. Winner!

Cost: Transit wins again. Is the ExST worth the extra $$$$ over a Transit work van? I think based on my super scientific research, it is not. Time to go trade the ST in!
 

OP
CareerFiremanGuy

CareerFiremanGuy

1000 Post Club
Firefighter/EMT
Messages
1,083
Reactions
812
Points
262
Location
USA
Vehicle
2022 Ford Explorer ST
Thread Starter #12
In light of an inane comment, the posturing for an irrelevant point, I'll compare logical thought to nonsensical musings.

A Van: is not an SUV

A Sedan: is not an SUV

A Truck: is not an SUV

Hope that was informational enough for those in need. Time to search for those who possess critical thinking!
 

ZRX61

Member
U.S. Air Force Veteran
Messages
315
Reactions
195
Points
37
Location
L A, CA, USA
#13
In light of an inane comment, the posturing for an irrelevant point, I'll compare logical thought to nonsensical musings.

A Van: is not an SUV

A Sedan: is not an SUV

A Truck: is not an SUV

Hope that was informational enough for those in need. Time to search for those who possess critical thinking!
And like the Expedition, the Navigator is built on the F150 frame & running gear etc.
 

Messages
390
Reactions
359
Points
67
Location
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Vehicle
2020 Explorer ST
#14
Where was critical thinking missing:

Post 1: Performance stat comparison between the Navigator and ExST showing they accelerate about the same and the Navigator handles like the Titanic. This is silliness as the Navigator is a lux SUV that really only needs to get out of it's own way, while the ExST is a performance SUV.

Post 7: Basic size stat comparison, then questioning the cost difference. This is silliness as there's no context to the interior size difference; how does the extra height effect headroom, how does the longer wheelbase effect passenger leg room? It's implied then the Navigator is an entire Maverick more expensive than the ExST for no reason other than a few extra cubes of interior room. There's no mention of the real reason for the difference: the interior. Navigator has one of the nicest interiors in the game with multiple unusual colors available, while the Explorer, well, it's interior is functional and indicative of the standard Explorer base price being less than half of the Navigator's base price.

Post 11: A sarcastic, pointless post comparing 2 entirely different vehicles, much like this thread. At least Post 11 touches on the key difference between those 2 vehicles (3rd line), while no post I saw touched on the key difference between the the Navigator and ExST.
 



Top